Monday, 19 October 2015

No flat for you!

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/10/17/no-flat-for-you/
A recent article on TodayOnline’s “The Big Read: The last Ubinites — a short hop, and a world away” gives a snapshot of life on the idyllic kampong. One of the last haven from the bustling metropolis mainland, residents of Pulau Ubin enjoy the peace, quiet and vast nature the island offers.
For one family however, the need to move to the mainland seems pressing. Mdm Ong Siew Fong, the island’s temple guardian, lives on the island with her husband and daughter, both handicapped and in wheelchairs. Every so often, Mdm Ong makes the bumboat ride with her domestic helper and husband to Singapore mainland for the husband’s medical appointments. They often have to wait for high tides when it is possible to move the husband’s wheelchair onto the boat.
As it is getting harder for them on the bumboat rides, the family tried applying for a HDB flat. After paying a deposit of $1,000, their application was rejected because the family income was too low, at $1,300. As a result, their hard earned savings that formed the deposit was forfeited.
Wasn’t it not too long ago that a prominent Minister of Singapore said Singaporeans who earn $1,000 could afford a HDB flat? If that is so, why has HDB defied the Minister’s logic and turned down the family’s application? Is there coordination between what Ministers say and how Ministries act or was the Minister’s calculation a dud?
Moreover, if HDB thinks the family is too poor to afford a flat, why further burden them by forfeiting their deposit? $1000 is a lot of money, you can afford a flat with this amount, you know?

unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
man ki lan man.
defend country pm lee?
http://app.sgdi.gov.sg/listing.asp?agency_subtype=dept&agency_id=0000000118
if you got go coffee shop drink, ask all the pia kia stalk them?
did lky engage pia kia? maybe lhl should try? i dunno.
Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
is it wrong to track ppl? i assume is not. rc member trace my wi fi all the way to my house. till now police never give me an explanation. police?
so is not wrong to follow ppl home. private investigator also do that. does all employee in a PI firm all have license?
is giving out personal information wrong in singapore? i assume is not too. so track all police address and give to gangster? wrong? police take out baton outside my house is correct?
but when i got my own internal family problems. police very li hai. can do all sort of things. but when it external ppl attack my family, police hide. police?
Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
chan chun sing always say this family no filial piety. that family no filial piety. still say on radio.
can chan chun sing announce this?
Rating: +6 (from 6 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
i saw 2 ppl forfeit in my life before. you must be living in mountains.
even if it is real. what is being done?
my bicycle being stolen. dad car being vandalise. where is police?
rc member trace wi fi. police take out baton. where is police?
but own domestic affair issue warning. and it very fast. but the rest i mention above dunno take how long.
where is legal recourse for me? for ppl who suffer injustice? under the pledge, justice and equality. where is legal recourse for others in a state? or no. our minister dont understand english. i wonder how they get their degree. sex for grade? buy one?
you shout at wp mp they dont even call police. police can abuse ppl. commoner cant abuse civil servant? the polices is you created to make ppl in anger mode which cause ppl to abuse civil servant.
even old uncle just sit down there in yishun. the police also try to attempt an arrest? take lie detector test. you go and confront the old uncle for nth, the old uncle of course shout at you. what kind of police?
tony tan son defer 12 yrs ns:
the story may be fake to discredit pap gahmen.
her mp should investigate and report officially.
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
all singapore stuff comment say the singapore citizen should treat the ica officer better. trying doing that in US.
no logic.
us citizen will do that in their own air port too. do you know? can those person who say that have their ip track and see what job they do? principal divorce still can become principal? logic? values? all true wealth are biological? than roy predicition may be true. look at sgh. u say because of this one case of sgh, cannot condemn? there is many more unreported. what one case? ur investigation committee got study or not?
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
since pap like to be voted so much. all vote pap. see what can they do. dont saw we never vote. dont say we traitor. so what now in sgh? u like to be voted so much. we vote you. so what now chan chun sing? this family no piety, that family no piety. sgh family die one got piety, keep crying. what now chan chun sing? talk is easy mah, u like to say this family no piety, that family no piety.
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

SDP: Non-Transparency over Hep C Outbreak Extremely Serious

http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/10/09/sdp-non-transparency-over-hep-c-outbreak-extremely-serious/

SDP: Non-Transparency over Hep C Outbreak Extremely Serious


The SDP sends our condolences to the bereaved families of those who died from the recent Hepatitis C outbreak at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) as well as to those who are infected by this serious viral infection.
We look forward to an expeditious and comprehensive investigation into how the episode occurred and, subsequently, deteriorated and what steps are being taken to prevent future mishaps.
What is disturbing, however, is the non-transparent manner in which the incident was handled by the Government. Information about the outbreak apparently first emerged between April 17 and May 14 this year when the first five cases of the hepatitis C infections were reported by the SGH to the Ministry of Health (MOH).
The SDP appreciates the difficulty in distinguishing between acute and chronic infections of hepatitis C in some of these cases, as explained by the MOH in its statement today. But even if it was only in August that the MOH was informed that cases were suspected to be linked, it would have been aware of the first outbreak in April. And yet the public was not informed.
Most of these patients were apparently transplant recipients who, according to the Singhealth website, are routinely screened for hepatitis pre-transplant. Thus, their conversion from negative to positive would have been an indicator of an acute or subacute infection.
Also, it appears that infection control reviews may have been conducted from at least June 2015 for patients in the affected wards. Thus, patient safety as well as safety of the blood supply were potentially compromised by delays in notification of the general public, especially those vulnerable patients who might have gone through the affected units.
This is because individuals who may have been recently infected with the virus and incubating it may have gone on to donate blood without knowing that they were in the “window period”. This is a potentially extremely serious situation.
It is our understanding that the outbreak is the among the most widespread in medical history. Yet the MOH kept the matter under wraps and did not keep the public informed. This is in marked contrast to the SARS Epidemic in 2003 when the Government handled the matter with much more transparency.
The secretiveness in this episode is unwarranted as the public has the right to know – and the Government the obligation to inform the public – of such a life-and-death matter. The management of the incident by the Government raises two important questions:
One, why was the public not informed when the outbreak was recognised and investigations commenced in May-June 2015 despite the potential risks to other patients?
Two, was the withholding of the information a political consideration?
The Government needs to answer these questions and account to the people over the matter.
Singapore Democrats

unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
No one dare to voice out when they have problems. Everyone got family to feed. So keep quiet to keep jobs. Who want to learn like me? In Tampines HDB? Do I receive my fairness? Do LH* bother to what happen to me? What is education for? What is religion for? What is lie detector for? Defend country PM Lee? I am following what religion and education teach me. What do I get?
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)
http://www.tremeritus.com/2015/10/13/hep-c-saga-pm-lee-fails-to-answer-crucial-question/

Hep C saga: PM Lee fails to answer crucial question

Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong recently commented on the hepatitis C scandal, saying that “we also always have to be open and transparent with the public and with the patients about what has happened because we must maintain public confidence, and trust in the healthcare system.”
Undoubtedly. Mr Lee, however, omitted that there must also be trust in the political system to ensure the safety of the people. He failed to mention that the Infectious Disease Act (IDA) mandates that infectious diseases be promptly reported to Ministry of Health (MOH).
Also, according to the Public Hospitals and Medical Clinics Act (PHMCA), the director of medical services at MOH is to be immediately informed of outbreaks of hospital acquired infection. Section 4.44 of the Act states that the “The Director shall be informed immediately of (a) Any patient or staff with a notifiable disease, (b) Outbreaks of hospital-acquired infections.”
Both these Acts mean that the Government would have been automatically alerted when the first cases of the infection occurred between May and June 2015.
Given such a scenario, the question that PM Lee needs to answer is why was the public not informed of the deadly incident at the very first instance? There was up to a 5-month lapse of silence between the first occurences of the infection and their public disclosure by the Government.
Even if we accept Minister for Health Gan Kim Yong’s statement that the MOH was not officially notified of the matter until late August (which would be in direct contradiction to the IDA and PHMCA), why did he wait for another two months before disclosing the episode – which by then had claimed 8 lives (five apparently contributed to by the infection) and caused 22 infections – in October 2015?
It must be made clear that there are two important issues raised by this episode. The first is the security lapse at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) which the hospital must answer for. The second relates to the delay in the public disclosure of the incident which has nothing to do with officials and staff at the SGH and everything to do with the PAP Government.
The two issues must not be conflated and, more important, the Government must not obscure its role in the matter by pushing the blame exclusively on SGH.
To the second issue of the Government’s failure to inform the public of the outbreak in a timely manner, we repeat the following questions which PM Lee failed to answer in his address of the saga:
One, why was the public not informed when the outbreak was recognised and investigations commenced in May-June 2015 despite the potential risks to other patients?
Two, was the withholding of the information a political consideration? In other words, was the announcement delayed because of the General Elections?
Chee Soon Juan
Secretary-General
Singapore Democratic Party

unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
I complain about lift, no one bother, then lift event happen.
Went to SGH, so many doctors ask me same questions, for fun? Then come Hep C Saga.
If my anger is not solved, everyday I will think of it, like the aunty that curse khaw.
Rating: +24 (from 24 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
siao liao. the author is sdp. i din see. does it make me opposition? i am dead. shit opposition say you tube movie? let move on. maybe ask sgag draw pictures.
long time never run still can run 5km? lying? hack my mobile? defend country pm lee? blame pm lee? can he know everything? my town council here still haven rectify the defect i spotted. blame pm lee? feed back use full? psychology? ntu? nus? mental illness? is those spy they recruited report correct thing on every person? is there spy? are they honest?
i think those people report problem like sgh hep c saga. all dont care. than got mental illness? study medical at ntu or nus? got have sex for result? poor people work hard really got skill condemn. rich ppl sent kids go oversea who cannot study come back singapore and reset to doctor status? i dunno. only ppl on top have info know.
cos they want sent my mum go jail on 2nd warning. but what happen when mas selamat run away and dinesh die? or the police who go insane for nothing and take out baton while the gate is lock?
take lie detector test? blame lky play bat man to secure until sg50? is lhl hard enough to make head roll? cover problem and sweep under car pet? but blame shaw go find prostitude? he finding wife? ask her underage? lame law? the judge cant even think?
roy prediction of slum is coming true? boom. industrial go on fire.
Rating: +7 (from 7 votes)
 
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
Saw 2 police car at Anchorvale CC. The police board the car. Like so unhappy. What is wrong?
When I cycle back, LTA booking some car at Anchorvale CC. A group of people walk out with a guy in PA T Shirt. Shouting at the LTA guy. Who is wrong first? Where is police? Singapore got more and more gangster with no tattoo? Take lie detector test?
Is this what *KY and LH* wanted?
Police want to hit quota right? There is a lot.
Rating: +3 (from 3 votes)
 
unresolvedgrievances.blogspot:
sorry. dunno lta or cisco. i saw is cisco. should be green car. sjd? ask police check. go check. why? is it no put coupon? got money buy car, no money put coupon? break law still ya ya pa pa ya? rc member can trace ppl wi fi? police job protect innocent and naive ppl? why police no probe in sgh? not consider break law? werid. getting worse and worse. how would lky change in strategy according to what happen nowadays?
Rating: +2 (from 2 votes)